It seems the president can do whatever he wants whenever he wants, with little political backlash back home. Keep a bridge closed—no problem. Make a red card disappear—no problem. Bomb a country—no problem.

By Sheila Copps
First published in The Hill Times on July 20, 2026.

OTTAWA—Gordie Howe must be turning over in his grave. The political football attached to the bridge bearing the legendary hockey player’s name has made a laughing stock of signed agreements.

It seems the president of the United States has the power to unilaterally shut down bridges and revoke red cards in international sporting events.

And no one in his party appears ready to challenge him.

Just look at the trajectory of the American senator felled last week by an aortic dissection.

In the eulogies following Lindsey Graham’s death, we were reminded that he was best friends with John McCain in the early days of his political career.

When McCain passed, Graham said, “America and Freedom have lost one of her greatest champions, and I have lost one of my dearest friends and mentors. I will need some time to absorb this, but I want Cindy and the entire McCain family to know they are in our prayers.”

His support for McCain ran counter to the view expressed by U.S. President Donald Trump who constantly attacked McCain’s record as a renowned prisoner of war.

Graham characterized Trump as “unfit for office” after the president said, “I like people who aren’t captured.”

Trump often used social media postings to characterize a prisoner of war as “dummy” and “loser.”

There was a time when Graham stood up against the president. After the infamous Jan. 6, 2021, riot on Capitol Hill, Graham said he had finally had enough of Trump. “Trump and I, we’ve had a hell of a journey. I hate it to end this way. Oh my God, I hate it. From my point of view he’s been a consequential president. All I can say is count me out. Enough is enough.”

But just four months after that statement, Graham came to the conclusion that the Republican Party could not move forward without Trump.

As the president used his political heft to overthrow Republican politicians who did not align with his viewpoint, Graham reversed his position and became one of Trump’s most loyal backers.

Some could argue that is the nature of political survival. But if that is the case, it is hard to see how the United States can ever get beyond the harm that has been caused by the president in multiple areas beyond his jurisdiction.

FIFA president Gianni Infantino’s decision to overturn a referee’s decision to issue a red card to an American player caused massive opposition in the sporting community and beyond.

European lawmakers are demanding an investigation in the affair. Trump has admitted reaching out to Infantino for a reversal of the red card which would have kept American striker Folarin Balogun out of the next game.

Infantino said the decision was made by a committee.

His intervention followed a decision made by Infantino last December when he honoured Trump with the first FIFA Peace Prize.

Apparently, there was no committee and zero process for the recognition which also prompted attacks on the political neutrality that FIFA is supposed to observe.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has been asked to review the red card withdrawal by Fairsquare, a British non-governmental organization.

Fairsquare also filed a complaint with FIFA last December. Backed by more than 50 European parliamentarians and the Norwegian Football Federation, the NGO complained that the Peace Prize awarded by FIFA to Trump broke the soccer organization’s political neutrality rule.

When Infantino became an IOC member in 2020, he swore a pledge of political neutrality. If found in breach, he could be expelled from the IOC.

The complaint also alleges that a 2026 World Cup fan site was used for data harvesting to link fans to another Trump website.

The IOC will have no choice but to fully investigate the complaint with consequences.

In the meantime, there doesn’t seem to be much of an outcry in Washington from Republicans.

Like Graham, most have decided to stay in Trump’s good books or face his political wrath in Republican nomination battles.

The upcoming November midterm elections may change that perspective, but, in the meantime, the president can do whatever he wants whenever he wants, with little political backlash back home.

Keep a bridge closed—no problem. Make a red card disappear—no problem. Bomb a country—no problem.

It seems the American president is simply outside the law.

Sheila Copps is a former Jean Chrétien-era cabinet minister and a former deputy prime minister. Follow her on Twitter at @Sheila_Copps.

Some might argue the president’s grievances about the Gordie Howe International Bridge are simply an attempt to distract from the global discussion about his racist post featuring former president Barack Obama and Michelle Obama as monkeys

By Sheila Copps
First published in The Hill Times on February 16, 2026.

OTTAWA—If you build it, they will come. Except if opponents are friends of United States President Donald Trump.

Trump’s latest foray into Canadian politics is a false claim that a new bridge about to be opened at the Windsor-Detroit border should be delayed because no American steel was used in the construction, which is not true. He also stated that the bridge would not open unless the U.S. was compensated for everything it has given to Canada.

The irony of Trump’s complaints is that the U.S. government refused to participate in the initial cost of the bridge construction, which was fully financed by the Government of Canada. It is hard pressed to make labour or content demands on the project.

The president’s last-minute intervention is another example of how corrupt the American political system has become.

The Gordie Howe International Bridge has been in consideration for more than two decades.

The Ambassador Bridge, built in 1929, is North America’s No. 1 international border crossing. It is privately owned, and multiple attempts to build a new bridge beginning at the turn of the century have been blocked by the current owners, the American Moroun family.

Despite the obvious need for a second bridge, the Morouns’ political influence and lawsuits delayed the process for years.

In a newspaper column in 2012, journalist David Frum characterized the dispute as a conflict between private and public infrastructure where the monopoly led by the Moroun family used influence in Washington, D.C., to derail a proposed public sector bridge for decades.

Finally, in frustration, the Canadian government agreed to fully fund the joint bridge on the condition that the investment be recouped through tolls.

The proposed bridge was ultimately named after Gordie Howe, the popular Canadian hockey player who spent most of his NHL career with the Detroit Red Wings. The bilateral agreement was signed by the Canadian and Michigan governments, and both parties are joint owners of the bridge scheduled to open early this year.

The construction has taken more than eight years, and the project was led by the “Building North America” consortium which was selected in July 2018 to design, build, operate and maintain the bridge.

The $6.4-billion cost of the project was fully financed by the Government of Canada, a fact that seemed to be missing from Trump’s latest Truth Social grievance taking aim at the bridge’s ownership structure and claiming that Canada has “treated the United States unfairly for decades.”

Washington did not put out a penny for the project, so it is hard to claim that the U.S. has been treated unfairly.

Michigan politicians were quick to point out the second bridge will facilitate commerce and trade between the two countries. Governor Gretchen Whitmer weighed in to support the opening, saying that the bridge agreement was approved by her Republican predecessor.

The only people who seem to be benefitting from threats to stall the bridge opening are the family members who own the Ambassador Bridge.

As Frum pointed out in 2012, the move to block a second bridge is a perfect example of how public policy is stymied by private interests. In the end, it is the trade between the two countries that suffers.

That may fit with Trump’s agenda as he is obviously not interested in a seamless transportation network between Canada and the U.S.

But it certainly hurts his own country’s economic agenda, which is why Michigan politicians are all lining up in favour of opening the Gordie Howe bridge as soon as possible.

U.S. ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra has been assigned to manage the file for the president. Hoekstra is a former Michigan congressman.

Some might argue the bridge kerfuffle was simply an attempt by Trump to distract from the global discussion about his racist post featuring former president Barack Obama and Michelle Obama as monkeys.

The meme on Trump’s personal account on Truth Social stayed online for 12 hours, with press secretary Karoline Leavitt characterizing reaction as “fake outrage.” She claimed: “This is from an internet meme video depicting President Trump as the king of the jungle and Democrats as characters from the Lion King.”

Even Republicans chimed in to attack the post, with U.S. Senator Tim Scott “praying it was fake because it’s the most racist thing I have seen from this White House.”

Other Republicans condemned the post, but the president insisted he did nothing wrong, and was not about to apologize.

In most jurisdictions, such a racist publication would likely spark calls for resignation.

In this case, presidential filters, accountability, and respect are non-existent. Trump celebrates racism and inflames hatred.

It is just another crazy week at the White House.

Sheila Copps is a former Jean Chrétien-era cabinet minister and a former deputy prime minister. Follow her on Twitter at @Sheila_Copps.