In last week’s palace revolt, there is no heir apparent standing in the wings. Although several candidates are already preparing, including some in cabinet, there is no single juggernaut organizationally.
By Sheila Copps
First published in The Hill Times on October 28, 2024.
OTTAWA—Prime Minister Justin Trudeau dodged a bullet from his own party last week.
A document signed by 24 caucus members set out the reasons why they think he should resign. One surprise element in the document was the deadline for his decision.
He has been told in no uncertain terms that he must make his future known one way or the other by Monday, Oct. 28.
The number of caucus members who did not sign the document is just as noteworthy as the number who did.
In a caucus of 153 members, some 130 chose not to participate in this ultimatum.
That doesn’t mean that they are all happy with the leadership, no matter what cabinet members have been saying for the cameras.
With poll numbers stagnating and a 19-point gap to close with Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, many ministers and MPs are repeating privately what the dissidents said at the Liberal caucus meeting on Oct. 23.
Some are voting with their feet, decided they are not seeking re-election for all kinds of good reasons. Most of them cite family and quality of life issues, but the cloud hanging over everyone’s head is winnability.
If they don’t make a move soon—and drastically—they are all risking defeat in an election expected next year.
Media reports said Trudeau listened attentively to the criticism and got emotional at times when he recounted the sacrifices his own family has made on his behalf.
In his own words, the prime minister has said that his decision to continue in politics was a factor in the end of his marriage.
That is an incredible sacrifice to make, and at some point, he has to evaluate whether it is really worth it.
The past year has been an unsuccessful effort to reboot the Liberal image.
The move to shake up cabinet and bring in younger, more diverse voices has not resulted in any upswing in Liberal support.
If anything, that shakeup actually accelerated Trudeau’s downward spiral as caucus grew more concerned when two relatively safe Liberal seats were lost in byelections in the key battlegrounds of Toronto and Montreal.
Trudeau has consistently refused to used paid advertising as a way to change the channel on his leadership. When he was elected in 2015, he promised to do away with government advertising that was deemed to be partisan.
But that promise is blowing up in his face as most Canadians have no idea that the federal government has introduced enhanced pharma care, national daycare, increased dental care and cross-Canada school food programs.
Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith underscored the decision by the Liberal Party not to spend a lot on advertising in a media interview after the caucus last week. He also called for an end to the “palace intrigue.”
His wish may be granted as most Liberal MPs don’t want to stab themselves in the back.
Back in the days of the fight between Jean Chrétien and Paul Martin, a similar letter circulated for weeks.
Martin supporters in the caucus had been working for years to smooth the way for their guy to take over, and this letter-writing campaign garnered more than 70 signatures.
The difference is that there was well-oiled machine behind the man who wanted to force Chrétien out.
Martin was widely viewed as a successful finance minister who could be a three-term prime minister himself.
In last week’s palace revolt, there is no single heir apparent standing in the wings. Although several candidates are already preparing—including some in the current cabinet—there is no single juggernaut organizationally.
The Oct. 28 deadline is a recognition that the time to replace Trudeau is running short if he were to decide that he wants to step down and prompt a leadership race.
With loss of the supply-and-confidence agreement with the New Democratic Party in September, the uncertainty of an early election also has Liberal members spooked.
They know that even if Trudeau goes, the time to put together a leadership scenario is a minimum of five months, and even that is cutting it short.
They may not have five months if all opposition parties decide they want to vote non-confidence.
Trudeau exited caucus last week pledging to reporters that “the Liberal Party is strong and united.”
That may be wishful thinking. They are certainly united in wanting some specific changes to how the government is getting its message out. And some simply want him out.
But don’t expect Trudeau to follow his father’s footsteps and take a walk in the snow this week.
Hill Times Editor’s note: Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith was referring to the Liberal Party of Canada’s lack of political advertising, not the Government of Canada’s. This column has been corrected and updated online.
Sheila Copps is a former Jean Chrétien-era cabinet minister and a former deputy prime minister. Follow her on Twitter at @Sheila_Copps.
